Favoritism That Fractures
James 2:1-13
My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory. For if a man wearing a gold ring and fine clothing comes into your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, and if you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, “You sit here in a good place,” while you say to the poor man, “You stand over there,” or, “Sit down at my feet,” have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? Listen, my beloved brothers, has not God chosen those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him? But you have dishonored the poor man. Are not the rich the ones who oppress you, and the ones who drag you into court? Are they not the ones who blaspheme the honorable name by which you were called?
If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well. But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it. For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.
My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory. For if a man wearing a gold ring and fine clothing comes into your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, and if you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, “You sit here in a good place,” while you say to the poor man, “You stand over there,” or, “Sit down at my feet,” have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? Listen, my beloved brothers, has not God chosen those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him? But you have dishonored the poor man. Are not the rich the ones who oppress you, and the ones who drag you into court? Are they not the ones who blaspheme the honorable name by which you were called?
If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well. But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it. For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.
Imagine a Sunday morning gathering in the first century. The believers are meeting in someone's home, perhaps a larger home that can accommodate thirty or forty people. The host, a wealthy merchant, has arranged cushioned seats near the front for distinguished guests. As people arrive, something uncomfortable happens. A man walks in wearing a gold ring, the kind that signals wealth and status in Roman society. Right behind him comes another man, his clothes stained with the sweat and grime of manual labor (he probably smells a bit). He couldn't change after working through the night. The host immediately escorts the wealthy visitor to the best seat. Then he glances at the laborer and points to the floor. "You can sit there, by my feet."
This scene isn't hypothetical. James describes it because it was happening in the early church. And if we're honest, it still happens today. We just use different markers for status.
James writes to scattered Jewish Christians facing real tensions between their faith in Jesus and the social systems they've always known. The Roman world ran on patronage and favoritism. Showing preference to the wealthy wasn't just acceptable, it was smart. It was how you survived and thrived. The poor had nothing to offer. The rich had everything you needed. So when these social dynamics crept into the Christian assembly, it must have seemed natural, even wise.
But James sees something we often miss. Favoritism isn't just bad manners. It's a fundamental betrayal of the gospel. James opens this section of his letter with shocking directness. "My brothers and sisters, believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ must not show favoritism." The Greek construction here creates an absolute prohibition. You cannot hold faith in Jesus while showing partiality. They're incompatible. The word James uses for favoritism literally means "receiving the face," judging someone by their external appearance rather than their inherent worth as God's image bearer.
In a world where your survival often depended on currying favor with the powerful, James tells these believers to treat everyone with equal honor. This wasn't just countercultural. It was economically risky. Yet James insists that faith in the glorious Lord Jesus Christ demands nothing less. The scene James paints shows how favoritism actually works in religious communities. First, there's special attention, literally "looking upon" the rich man with favor. Then comes the invitation to comfort and honor: "Sit here in this good place." The language suggests the best seat, probably cushioned, certainly prominent. Everyone would see this wealthy visitor receiving special treatment. Meanwhile, the poor man gets two equally degrading options: stand over there, out of the way, or sit on the floor by my footstool. The footstool detail particularly stings. In ancient culture, placing someone at your feet was a sign of dominance and subjugation.
James then delivers his verdict with a question that answers itself. "Have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?" The word for discriminated here connects back to James chapter one, where he warns about the double minded person who wavers between two opinions. When we show favoritism, we're wavering between God's value system and the world's. We're trying to serve two masters. And Jesus already told us how that works out. But James doesn't stop at exposing the problem. He dismantles the logic behind favoritism with three devastating arguments. First, he reminds them that God has chosen the poor to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom. This isn't saying poverty automatically creates faith or that wealth prevents it. James is echoing Jesus's own teaching about the kingdom belonging to the poor. God consistently chooses what the world rejects. He uses the weak to shame the strong. He elevates the humble and brings down the proud. When we favor the rich, we're literally working against God's own patterns.
Second, James points out the bitter irony of honoring those who oppress you. "Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court?" The believers James addresses knew this firsthand. Wealthy landowners would drag poor workers into court over debts. They would use the legal system to seize property and extend their control. Yet here were Christians giving these same oppressors the best seats in their assemblies.
Third, and most critical, these wealthy oppressors were blaspheming the noble name of Christ. How? Probably through their treatment of Christians in the marketplace and courts. Maybe through their mockery of a crucified Messiah. Possibly through their lives that claimed religious respectability while practicing exploitation. The believers were honoring those who dishonored their Lord.
Now James shifts to examine favoritism through the lens of God's law. If you really fulfill the royal law, he says, you do well. The royal law is simple: "Love your neighbor as yourself." This comes from Leviticus 19:18, and if you read that passage in context, you'll find commands against showing partiality in court just a few verses earlier. The connection isn't accidental. Love and favoritism cannot coexist.
James calls this the royal law not because a king commanded it but because it's the law of the kingdom. When we love our neighbors as ourselves, we're living as kingdom citizens. We're demonstrating the reality of God's reign. But when we show favoritism, we sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. Notice James doesn't say we make a mistake or have a lapse in judgment. He says we sin. We become transgressors, people who have stepped over the boundary line God established.
Then James makes an argument, "For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it." This isn't perfectionism. James isn't saying one sin damns you forever. He's making a point about the unified nature of God's law. The law isn't a checklist where we can score 90% and still pass. It's more like a chain. Break one link, and the whole chain fails. To illustrate this, James uses two commandments from the Ten Commandments: adultery and murder. The same God who said don't commit adultery also said don't murder. If you avoid adultery but commit murder, you haven't kept half the law. You've broken the law, period. You've revealed a heart that picks and chooses which of God's commands to obey. And selective obedience isn't really obedience at all.
We want to categorize sins. We have our acceptable sins and our scandalous ones. Favoritism feels minor compared to adultery or murder. But James destroys this comfortable hierarchy. Showing favoritism breaks God's law just as surely as these "major" sins. It reveals the same fundamental problem: a heart that hasn't fully submitted to God's authority. As James moves toward his conclusion, he issues a sobering command. "Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom." There's that paradox again, the law that gives freedom. How can law bring liberty? Because God's law isn't arbitrary rules designed to restrict us. It's the path to human flourishing. When we love our neighbors as ourselves, when we refuse to show favoritism, when we treat every person as bearing God's image, we're free from the exhausting games of social manipulation. We're free from the anxiety of maintaining hierarchies. We're free to love genuinely.
But we will be judged by this law. Our words and actions matter. How we treat others, especially those who can't benefit us, reveals whether we've truly experienced God's transforming grace. This leads James to a principle that should make us all pause. "Judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful."
This isn't salvation by works. James isn't saying we earn God's mercy by being merciful. He's describing a spiritual reality. Those who have genuinely experienced God's mercy become merciful. It transforms them. If someone claims to know God's mercy but shows no mercy to others, they're revealing they've never really encountered God's mercy at all. Jesus taught the same principle in his parable of the unmerciful servant. The servant who had been forgiven an enormous debt refused to forgive a tiny one. His actions proved he never truly understood the mercy he'd received.
And then comes the climax, one of the most powerful statements in Scripture. "Mercy triumphs over judgment." The Greek word here means to boast over, to exult in victory. James personifies mercy and judgment as combatants, and mercy wins. It doesn't just modify judgment or temper it. Mercy triumphs gloriously.
It's the heart of the gospel. At the cross, God's justice and mercy met. Jesus bore our judgment so mercy could triumph in our lives. We who deserved condemnation received compassion. We who earned wrath received welcome. And now, having received such mercy, we become its agents in the world.
Think about what this means for how we treat people. Every interaction becomes an opportunity to demonstrate mercy's triumph. The coworker who irritates us, the family member who disappoints us, the stranger who inconveniences us, they all become occasions for mercy to win. Not because they deserve it, any more than we deserved God's mercy, but because this is what kingdom people do. We show mercy because we've received mercy.
This brings us back to that assembly where the rich man gets the cushioned seat and the poor man sits on the floor. What would mercy look like there? Maybe it means the host gives his own seat to the laborer. Maybe it means the wealthy visitor insists on sitting on the floor in solidarity. Maybe it means the whole assembly rethinks how they arrange their space so no one is elevated above another. The specific expression matters less than the principle: mercy triumphs.
We need to see our own church in this light. Who are we overlooking? Not just economically, though that certainly matters. Who are the people we unconsciously judge as less valuable? The elderly woman who tells the same stories? The special needs child who disrupts the service? The formerly homeless man whose social skills are rough? The single mother with multiple children from different fathers? The immigrant whose English is broken? The teenager with piercings and tattoos? These are our opportunities to let mercy triumph.
But favoritism extends beyond Sunday gatherings. It shapes how we network professionally, giving preference to those who can advance our careers. It influences how we engage on social media, paying attention to those with large followings while ignoring those with few. It affects how we allocate our time, investing in relationships that benefit us while neglecting those that only cost us.
James confronts all of it. Every form of favoritism violates the royal law of love. Every act of partiality breaks faith with the glorious Lord Jesus Christ who showed no favoritism in his ministry. He touched lepers. He ate with tax collectors. He honored women. He blessed children. He chose fishermen as disciples. He died between thieves. And he offers the same salvation to all, regardless of status.
The gospel creates a new kind of community. Not one where differences disappear, but where differences don't determine value. The rich man and the laborer both bear God's image. Both need grace. Both can receive mercy. Both can become agents of that mercy in the world. When the church lives this reality, we become a prophetic sign of God's kingdom. We show the world what it looks like when mercy triumphs.
This isn't easy. Everything in our fallen nature wants to calculate advantage, to curry favor with the powerful, to distance ourselves from the needy. We've been trained by our culture to network strategically, to maximize our connections, to leverage relationships. But the gospel calls us to something radically different. It calls us to see every person through the lens of mercy.
So we return to that moment of decision in our own assemblies and lives. Someone walks in who doesn't fit our demographic, our social circle, our comfort zone. How we respond reveals whether we've truly grasped the gospel. Will we show favoritism, making distinctions based on worldly values? Or will we demonstrate the royal law of love, treating them as we would want to be treated? The answer determines more than we might think. Because according to James, it reveals whether mercy will triumph in our own judgment. Those who show mercy receive mercy. Those who judge by worldly standards will find themselves judged. But those who let mercy triumph in their treatment of others discover that mercy triumphs for them as well.
This is the scandal and beauty of the gospel. God shows no favoritism. The ground at the cross is level. And we who have received such radical mercy now have the privilege of extending it to others. Every day brings fresh opportunities to let mercy triumph. Every interaction offers a chance to demonstrate the royal law of love. Every person we meet bears the image of God and deserves the dignity that comes with it. The question isn't whether we'll encounter opportunities to show favoritism. We will. The question is whether we'll recognize these moments as tests of our faith. Will we default to the world's values or demonstrate kingdom priorities? Will we perpetuate systems of preference or participate in mercy's triumph? James has shown us the stakes. The choice is ours.
This scene isn't hypothetical. James describes it because it was happening in the early church. And if we're honest, it still happens today. We just use different markers for status.
James writes to scattered Jewish Christians facing real tensions between their faith in Jesus and the social systems they've always known. The Roman world ran on patronage and favoritism. Showing preference to the wealthy wasn't just acceptable, it was smart. It was how you survived and thrived. The poor had nothing to offer. The rich had everything you needed. So when these social dynamics crept into the Christian assembly, it must have seemed natural, even wise.
But James sees something we often miss. Favoritism isn't just bad manners. It's a fundamental betrayal of the gospel. James opens this section of his letter with shocking directness. "My brothers and sisters, believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ must not show favoritism." The Greek construction here creates an absolute prohibition. You cannot hold faith in Jesus while showing partiality. They're incompatible. The word James uses for favoritism literally means "receiving the face," judging someone by their external appearance rather than their inherent worth as God's image bearer.
In a world where your survival often depended on currying favor with the powerful, James tells these believers to treat everyone with equal honor. This wasn't just countercultural. It was economically risky. Yet James insists that faith in the glorious Lord Jesus Christ demands nothing less. The scene James paints shows how favoritism actually works in religious communities. First, there's special attention, literally "looking upon" the rich man with favor. Then comes the invitation to comfort and honor: "Sit here in this good place." The language suggests the best seat, probably cushioned, certainly prominent. Everyone would see this wealthy visitor receiving special treatment. Meanwhile, the poor man gets two equally degrading options: stand over there, out of the way, or sit on the floor by my footstool. The footstool detail particularly stings. In ancient culture, placing someone at your feet was a sign of dominance and subjugation.
James then delivers his verdict with a question that answers itself. "Have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?" The word for discriminated here connects back to James chapter one, where he warns about the double minded person who wavers between two opinions. When we show favoritism, we're wavering between God's value system and the world's. We're trying to serve two masters. And Jesus already told us how that works out. But James doesn't stop at exposing the problem. He dismantles the logic behind favoritism with three devastating arguments. First, he reminds them that God has chosen the poor to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom. This isn't saying poverty automatically creates faith or that wealth prevents it. James is echoing Jesus's own teaching about the kingdom belonging to the poor. God consistently chooses what the world rejects. He uses the weak to shame the strong. He elevates the humble and brings down the proud. When we favor the rich, we're literally working against God's own patterns.
Second, James points out the bitter irony of honoring those who oppress you. "Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court?" The believers James addresses knew this firsthand. Wealthy landowners would drag poor workers into court over debts. They would use the legal system to seize property and extend their control. Yet here were Christians giving these same oppressors the best seats in their assemblies.
Third, and most critical, these wealthy oppressors were blaspheming the noble name of Christ. How? Probably through their treatment of Christians in the marketplace and courts. Maybe through their mockery of a crucified Messiah. Possibly through their lives that claimed religious respectability while practicing exploitation. The believers were honoring those who dishonored their Lord.
Now James shifts to examine favoritism through the lens of God's law. If you really fulfill the royal law, he says, you do well. The royal law is simple: "Love your neighbor as yourself." This comes from Leviticus 19:18, and if you read that passage in context, you'll find commands against showing partiality in court just a few verses earlier. The connection isn't accidental. Love and favoritism cannot coexist.
James calls this the royal law not because a king commanded it but because it's the law of the kingdom. When we love our neighbors as ourselves, we're living as kingdom citizens. We're demonstrating the reality of God's reign. But when we show favoritism, we sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. Notice James doesn't say we make a mistake or have a lapse in judgment. He says we sin. We become transgressors, people who have stepped over the boundary line God established.
Then James makes an argument, "For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it." This isn't perfectionism. James isn't saying one sin damns you forever. He's making a point about the unified nature of God's law. The law isn't a checklist where we can score 90% and still pass. It's more like a chain. Break one link, and the whole chain fails. To illustrate this, James uses two commandments from the Ten Commandments: adultery and murder. The same God who said don't commit adultery also said don't murder. If you avoid adultery but commit murder, you haven't kept half the law. You've broken the law, period. You've revealed a heart that picks and chooses which of God's commands to obey. And selective obedience isn't really obedience at all.
We want to categorize sins. We have our acceptable sins and our scandalous ones. Favoritism feels minor compared to adultery or murder. But James destroys this comfortable hierarchy. Showing favoritism breaks God's law just as surely as these "major" sins. It reveals the same fundamental problem: a heart that hasn't fully submitted to God's authority. As James moves toward his conclusion, he issues a sobering command. "Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom." There's that paradox again, the law that gives freedom. How can law bring liberty? Because God's law isn't arbitrary rules designed to restrict us. It's the path to human flourishing. When we love our neighbors as ourselves, when we refuse to show favoritism, when we treat every person as bearing God's image, we're free from the exhausting games of social manipulation. We're free from the anxiety of maintaining hierarchies. We're free to love genuinely.
But we will be judged by this law. Our words and actions matter. How we treat others, especially those who can't benefit us, reveals whether we've truly experienced God's transforming grace. This leads James to a principle that should make us all pause. "Judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful."
This isn't salvation by works. James isn't saying we earn God's mercy by being merciful. He's describing a spiritual reality. Those who have genuinely experienced God's mercy become merciful. It transforms them. If someone claims to know God's mercy but shows no mercy to others, they're revealing they've never really encountered God's mercy at all. Jesus taught the same principle in his parable of the unmerciful servant. The servant who had been forgiven an enormous debt refused to forgive a tiny one. His actions proved he never truly understood the mercy he'd received.
And then comes the climax, one of the most powerful statements in Scripture. "Mercy triumphs over judgment." The Greek word here means to boast over, to exult in victory. James personifies mercy and judgment as combatants, and mercy wins. It doesn't just modify judgment or temper it. Mercy triumphs gloriously.
It's the heart of the gospel. At the cross, God's justice and mercy met. Jesus bore our judgment so mercy could triumph in our lives. We who deserved condemnation received compassion. We who earned wrath received welcome. And now, having received such mercy, we become its agents in the world.
Think about what this means for how we treat people. Every interaction becomes an opportunity to demonstrate mercy's triumph. The coworker who irritates us, the family member who disappoints us, the stranger who inconveniences us, they all become occasions for mercy to win. Not because they deserve it, any more than we deserved God's mercy, but because this is what kingdom people do. We show mercy because we've received mercy.
This brings us back to that assembly where the rich man gets the cushioned seat and the poor man sits on the floor. What would mercy look like there? Maybe it means the host gives his own seat to the laborer. Maybe it means the wealthy visitor insists on sitting on the floor in solidarity. Maybe it means the whole assembly rethinks how they arrange their space so no one is elevated above another. The specific expression matters less than the principle: mercy triumphs.
We need to see our own church in this light. Who are we overlooking? Not just economically, though that certainly matters. Who are the people we unconsciously judge as less valuable? The elderly woman who tells the same stories? The special needs child who disrupts the service? The formerly homeless man whose social skills are rough? The single mother with multiple children from different fathers? The immigrant whose English is broken? The teenager with piercings and tattoos? These are our opportunities to let mercy triumph.
But favoritism extends beyond Sunday gatherings. It shapes how we network professionally, giving preference to those who can advance our careers. It influences how we engage on social media, paying attention to those with large followings while ignoring those with few. It affects how we allocate our time, investing in relationships that benefit us while neglecting those that only cost us.
James confronts all of it. Every form of favoritism violates the royal law of love. Every act of partiality breaks faith with the glorious Lord Jesus Christ who showed no favoritism in his ministry. He touched lepers. He ate with tax collectors. He honored women. He blessed children. He chose fishermen as disciples. He died between thieves. And he offers the same salvation to all, regardless of status.
The gospel creates a new kind of community. Not one where differences disappear, but where differences don't determine value. The rich man and the laborer both bear God's image. Both need grace. Both can receive mercy. Both can become agents of that mercy in the world. When the church lives this reality, we become a prophetic sign of God's kingdom. We show the world what it looks like when mercy triumphs.
This isn't easy. Everything in our fallen nature wants to calculate advantage, to curry favor with the powerful, to distance ourselves from the needy. We've been trained by our culture to network strategically, to maximize our connections, to leverage relationships. But the gospel calls us to something radically different. It calls us to see every person through the lens of mercy.
So we return to that moment of decision in our own assemblies and lives. Someone walks in who doesn't fit our demographic, our social circle, our comfort zone. How we respond reveals whether we've truly grasped the gospel. Will we show favoritism, making distinctions based on worldly values? Or will we demonstrate the royal law of love, treating them as we would want to be treated? The answer determines more than we might think. Because according to James, it reveals whether mercy will triumph in our own judgment. Those who show mercy receive mercy. Those who judge by worldly standards will find themselves judged. But those who let mercy triumph in their treatment of others discover that mercy triumphs for them as well.
This is the scandal and beauty of the gospel. God shows no favoritism. The ground at the cross is level. And we who have received such radical mercy now have the privilege of extending it to others. Every day brings fresh opportunities to let mercy triumph. Every interaction offers a chance to demonstrate the royal law of love. Every person we meet bears the image of God and deserves the dignity that comes with it. The question isn't whether we'll encounter opportunities to show favoritism. We will. The question is whether we'll recognize these moments as tests of our faith. Will we default to the world's values or demonstrate kingdom priorities? Will we perpetuate systems of preference or participate in mercy's triumph? James has shown us the stakes. The choice is ours.
Recent
Archive
2025
January
May
July
2024
January
October
2023
February
March
Categories
no categories
No Comments